The GNU Backgammon mailing list

You can post suggestions, bug reports, and questions to the GNU Backgammon mailing list. The address is: bug-gnubg@gnu.org. You must subscribe to the mailing list before you can post. The mailing list is also archived, and you can browse the archive here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/.
You should also subscribe to the mailing list at this site: http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg.

Before you post anything to the mailing list you should read and understand the text below.

Mailing list guidelines


Subscription

You may always subscribe to our mailing list or change your subscribtion options at http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg. This is also the place for unsubscribing.

Subject

Please use a meaningful subject. There is no use in " bug found", "gnubg", "help" or "Please help" as subject. If you really want to be smart put a
or any other meaningful category in front of your own subject.
For example:
 | Subject: bug: gnubg crashes when loading Snowie .mat file

Formatting

Please don't use html e-mails. A few e-mail programs like Outlook Express send html per default. It is easy to change this in the option menu. Further information can be found at http://www.amsat.org/amsat/listserv/express.html.

Signature

Your signature should be no bigger than four (4) lines and start with a
"-- "
(Yes, this are two hyphens (minus signs) followed by a space).
Do not include graphics, logos, pictures or other strange images as part of your signature.
If you quote text of another posting, it's not necessary to quote his signature also.

Quoting

The object of quoting is to make it possible for a reader to see an exchange of e-mails as though they were listening to a conversation. The reader should normally not need to go back and read a previous e-mail to see what point you are replying to, nor should they need to scroll backwards and forwards in your e-mail to find the different parties to a conversation.
Ideally when responding to someone else's e-mail, you should quote only enough of that person's e-mail to let the reader know what the other person wrote that you are responding to. Remove any other text that isn't relevant to your reply. Some topics can develop into threads of 10 or more e-mails and no-one wants to read the same irrelevant portions 10 times while following the thread.
If you are responding to more than one topic in someone else's e-mail, then quote each of those topics separately and put your responses immediately below the associated topic.
Please avoid top quouting and full qouting. What do we mean? A few MS Windows
e-mail programs (like Outlook Express) always quote the original e-mail in full at the bottom of the reply and put your cursor at the top when you begin composing a reply. The result is referred to as top quoting - all the responses come at the top and the reader has to scroll down to see what it is you are replying to. Failure to remove those portions of the original e-mail to which you are not replying is referred to as full quoting. In the worst case, a lengthy exchange of e-mails could end up with 10 or 15 copies of the original e-mail. Top quoting and full quoting are some of the most annoying behaviours in mailing lists.
With "good" quoting you will greatly enhance the readability of this list and our liability to help. Here is an example of qouting how it should be:


| Adam wrote:
|
| > Here is a bunch of text by someone. This was originally a 25 line
| > paragraph, but [snip irrelevant portion]
|
| Now you, as the author, respond to those points, right here.
| If you have more to quote, do so:
|
| > Someone still had a couple more points to which you wanted to
| > reply, so you quote them [but still snip unneeded stuff]
|
| and respond to it.
|
| Your sig then typically follows (but DON'T quote Someone's sig,
| unless that is what you are responding to... and if so, you'd better
| make sure that it is relevant to a Lawhead mailing list, or that it
| is a miniscule fraction of your otherwise completely on-topic post.)

When you answer to a posting, please always use the "reply" or "reply to list" button. This will keep a thread readable like

| ---- original posting A
| --------|-- direct answer to A (B)
| ---------------|-- direct answer to B (C)
| ----------------------|-- direct answer to C
| --------|-- direct answer to A (D)
| ---------------|---direct answer to D

Also write new posts instead of replying to very old posts and change the subject. This will ensure correct threading.

Attachments

No. Don't send attached files to this mailing list if they are bigger than appr. 10 kb. Exception: You are asked to do so (mostly in a direct e-mail, very seldom to this mailing list. I.e. it may happen that someone asks you to send one of your match files.
If you have access to a webpage, put your file on it and send us the url.

Bug reports

Much as the developers would like to see nothing but praise and astonishment from the users, bugs do occur and they form one of the main purposes of this list. A good bug report makes it much easier for a developer to find and (one hopes) fix a problem. What's needed:You may also use http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=gnubg for reporting a bug. If you you are clever (and we know you are) you may search the page mentioned above or the mailing list archive at http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/ if your bug already has been reported and if there is already a solution or workaround.
posted at 17:52:57 on 09/30/04 by webadmin - Category: General
[Printer friendly version]

Comments

Jean Marc wrote:

Hi , i have two corrupted .dll when installing gnu backgammon for windows
1 : fretypt6.dll
2 : iconv.dll

So, I cannot install the game
Is there a way to repair this ?
12/06/04 10:42:52

Jean Marc wrote:

Hi again i finally got it by downloading again .
Thanks for the game
12/06/04 17:40:20

balrog wrote:

Hi,
in what file does gnu save the players data base?
Is it possible to extract these data base and insert it into a new installation of gnu?

Thanks
01/18/05 19:52:17

ElvisBurger wrote:

Hi,

Is there a version of GNU Backgammon which can be used to perform game evaluations, error rates, equity, etc., via an established API, or via a standard-alone server?

Try to hunt for some documentation about the code, especially the evaluation engines, but to no avail.

Thanks
03/07/06 17:00:48

bisusya wrote:

hi ý'm a fun of gnu backgammon.but When ý want to play with grandmaster/computer ý usually win computer.ý want to change my settings to a unbreakable computer.how can ý do that.help please..(ý try to change pillies vs.but didnt work..
05/09/06 18:31:03

mulligak wrote:

Hi. How difficult would it be to extend the functionality of gnubg to be able play No Hit BG. The rule set is only slightly modified, though I have no idea about the training overhead? Cheers
08/01/06 19:27:12

piedro wrote:

hi!

I used GnuBG for playing. THat is great. Thanks for your great work!

Now I want to analyse my games. I use the analyzer. Also great!

But: When I try to save the games to the database then I can only add the analysis to my player account. THat's great also. Bur when I add the match to the relational database, It seems to work, but I don#t get any message back. WHen I try to use "show records" of the relational database I get a "database Error"-window without any explanation.

Can anybody help me out or tell me where I find some documentation on the relational database feature?

I'm using the newest windows buil, but I tried the linux rpms on SuSE also.

I'd be glad for an answer,
thx, piedro
09/30/06 12:48:21

Jonathan wrote:

Tutor Mode is a Torture Device

I'm disappointed with the new Version 0.16-mingw (build Mar 6 2007) because the developers don’t fixed the problem in gnubg TUTOR mode.

After the torture mode appoint one error, if you click hint to see the best move, when you try return to the game, gnu repeat the same evaluation, torturing efficiently you, and wasting precious time.

In spite of the developers are experienced and good programers, that foolishness had survived update after update.

Thanks.

Jonathan
03/28/07 05:01:08

philipmayII wrote:

great program. I'm running it on a MacBook Pro. Only downside is it takes a while to crunch the numbers when set to 2-ply ... but patience is a virtue, right?

Thanks so much for making it available to the new Intel macs.
06/18/07 00:56:59

rdwray wrote:

cannot close dialog boxes.
crashes when trying to export.
can't install updates.
08/28/07 17:08:42

rdwray wrote:

another one. have to use task manager to close program when quiting in the middle of a game.
08/28/07 17:30:30

rdwray wrote:

more bugs.
can't change random seed.
program takes forever to close and crashes about 50% of the time.
09/01/07 15:13:44

rdwray wrote:

I am now 100% sure that this game cheats. I have spent hours and played hundreds of games using internal number generation and manual number generation using Excel. I will only win 1 out of 20 games, or less, using the internal generator. When using the manual, I win 10 to 1. This is self explanatory.
09/13/07 22:01:59

Goreli wrote:

I've just installed it. No problems so far.

Had my first match with gnubg. This is a great tool! Definately going to help improving my bg skills.

Is it possible to use it for playing with other people remotely? If yes, how? Any published instructions?
09/15/07 01:20:19

stvs wrote:

hello the latests builds of gnu have a problem after calibrate speed the system is freezing after few secs os mins.
i run it as admin in vista.
but other applications dont have problem at full cpu load. also in 4 ply analysis
the system is freezing..at core duo load 100%. why?
03/06/09 19:10:41

Add Comments

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it
I have no doubt that GNU Backgammon 2-ply would show a positive result if given enough time vs. any human player in match play.
--Neil Kazaross

Screenshots

ScreenshotScreenshotScreenshotScreenshotScreenshot
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Powered by Nucleus CMS